4 Cal. 4th 335 - People v. Karaman’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 200 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 212 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably 16 Cal. 4th 1081 - People v. Howard (1997), 18 Cal. 4th 24 - People v. Benson (1998)
6 federal appellate · 200 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Benton v. Maryland · 33 Cal. 3d 572 - People v. Fosselman · 37 Cal. 3d 351 - People v. McDonald · Bronson v. Schulten · 53 Cal. 2d 370 - People v. Banks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 212 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In a criminal case, judgment is rendered when the trial court orally pronounces sentence.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“at any time prior to execution of the sentence”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“When a defendant subject to this section or subdivision (b) of Section 1168 has been sentenced to be imprisoned in the state prison and has been committed to the custody of the Director of Corrections, the court may, within 120 days of the date of commitment on its own motion, or at any time upon the recommendation of the Director of Corrections or the Board of Prison Terms, recall the sentence and commitment previously ordered and resentence the defendant in the same manner as if he or she had not previously been sentenced, provided the new sentence, if any, is no greater than the initial sentence....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.