Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 Cal. 5th 421 - People v. Perez

4 Cal. 5th 421 - People v. Perez’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

25 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Chapman v. State of California · Crawford v. Washington · Davis v. Washington · 46 Cal. 2d 818 - People v. Watson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While [the testifying pathologist] relied on hearsay forming his opinion, he is permitted to do so under Sanchez and Evidence Code section 802. [Citation.] The jury would have thus heard [his] opinion about the cause of death even if the trial court had denied admission of the challenged hearsay statements. So we conclude that any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “' [Citation.] But the evidence must nonetheless connect the defendant to the crime itself, rather than simply connect the accomplice to the crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'[I]n reviewing a trial court's denial of a defendant's motion for individual sequestered jury selection, we apply the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.