Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 Cal. 5th 658 - People v. Buza

4 Cal. 5th 658 - People v. Buza’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
December 2021
most recently cited

28 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 34 U.S.C. § 12592 · 42 U.S.C. § 14131 (§ 210303 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994)

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Mapp v. Ohio · Franks v. Delaware · Rakas v. Illinois · Florida v. Royer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen officers make an arrest supported by probable cause to hold for a serious offense and they bring the suspect to the station to be detained in custody”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Haskell v. Brown · 242 Cal. Rptr. 3d 530 - People v. Marquez
  2. “validly arrested on 'probable cause to hold for a serious offense' ... as 'part of a routine booking procedure.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 242 Cal. Rptr. 3d 530 - People v. Marquez · 238 Cal. Rptr. 3d 313 - People v. Laird
  3. “the necessary showing at a noticed hearing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Haskell v. Brown · 6 Cal. 5th 118 - People v. C.B. (In Re C.B.)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.