4 Cal. App. 120 - People v. Hemple’s Empirical Analysis
1906
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 1962
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. McLean · Ex parte Hedley · People v. Gordon · Cussen v. Southern California Savings Bank · People v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A defendant is entitled to have an instruction given when it announces the law responsive to every element of his defense shown by the evidence. The defendant testified to circumstances and facts that stand undisputed which showed that other persons than himself had opportunities of . . . committing the crime. ... I think that under the facts appearing in this case this instruction should have been given, and it was prejudicial error to have refused it.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Apodaca v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.