Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 Cal. App. 3d 610 - Baxter v. Phillips

4 Cal. App. 3d 610 - Baxter v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 2016

18 state decisions

10019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lear, Inc. v. Adkins · Rose v. Melody Lane · Hamasaki v. Flotho · 66 Cal. 2d 821 - Jehl v. Southern Pacific Co. · 39 Cal. 2d 462 - Leipert v. Honold

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendants assert that consideration of the matters which might have warranted the grant of a new trial on the issue of damages is foreclosed because the court did not refer to such matters in its specification of the reasons for granting the new trial. This assertion gives an unwarranted effect to the requirements of section 647 [ sic ] of the Code of Civil Procedure. Those provisions only require that the court state the reasons for the ground on which the motion is granted. No findings or reasons are required for other grounds which have been asserted but, as in this case, have not been considered by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an appellate court in reversing a case for an error at the trial, upon finding that one issue ... is not tainted by any error, may order a limited new trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “unless such an order should have been made as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.