Drexler v. Petersen’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2401
Relies on United States v. Kubrick · 44 Cal. 3d 1103 - Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co. · 21 Cal. 4th 383 - Norgart v. Upjohn Co. · 18 Cal. 3d 93 - Sanchez v. South Hoover Hospital · Augustine v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'A defendant has the initial burden to show that undisputed facts support summary judgment based on the application of an affirmative defense.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.