Cassinelli v. Cassinelli’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1401 (Military Retirement Reform Act of 1986) · 10 U.S.C. § 1408 · 10 U.S.C. § 1413A · 26 U.S.C. § 104 · 38 U.S.C. § 101 (Agent Orange Act of 1991) · 38 U.S.C. § 1110 · 38 U.S.C. § 5301 · 42 U.S.C. § 407 (§ 207 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on McCarty v. McCarty · Mansell v. Mansell · Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc. · 21 Cal. 3d 779 - In Re Marriage of Stenquist · 41 Cal. 4th 1337 - Elkins v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Court finds that [Janice] has a 43.1% interest in [Robert]'s United States Air Force Pension, and that she shall receive the sum of Two Hundred Thirty ($230) Dollars per month, or 43.1% of said pension, whichever sum is greater. Said payments to commence on May 1, 1986, providing that [Robert] shall make such payments to [Janice] until such time as the United States Air Force is able to process [Janice]'s claims so that her share of the military pension can be paid directly to her.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“) by drawing on $44,000 in a 401(k) account and $15,000 in an annuity. In January 2014, Janice filed a motion to modify the judgment by ordering Robert to pay the amount of her share of his retired pay as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[f]ederal law which supersedes state law ... prohibits the non-military spouse[']s participation in the member's disability combat pay”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.