Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 CALAPP5TH 656 - People v. Padilla

People v. Padilla’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Teague v. Lane · Woodson v. North Carolina · Roper Superintendent Potosi Correctional Center v. Simmons · Schriro Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Summerlin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In view of Montgomery [which clarified that Miller set forth a substantive rule], the trial court must assess the Miller factors with an eye to making an express determination whether the juvenile offender's crime reflects permanent incorrigibility arising from irreparable corruption.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “' [citation], it rendered life without parole an unconstitutional penalty for 'a class of defendants because of their status'-that is, juvenile offenders whose crimes reflect the transient immaturity of youth. [Citation.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “' [Citation.] Because Miller determined that sentencing a child to life without parole is excessive for all but '”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.