Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 CALAPP5TH 829 - People v. Navarette

People v. Navarette’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Shepard v. United States · Jones v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if committed in California, [it would be] punishable by imprisonment in the state prison”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “include[ ] all of the elements of the particular felony as defined in”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'includes all of the elements of any serious felony' in California.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.