Bennett v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2015
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 171 · 5 U.S.C. § 5541 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 5542 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 5545 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 5548 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)
Relies on Perez v. United States · Burich v. United States · Fix v. United States · Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. United States · Anderson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The head of an agency, with the approval of the Office of Personnel Management may provide that ... an employee in a position in which the hours of duty cannot be controlled administratively, and which requires substantial amounts of irregular, unscheduled overtime duty ... shall receive premium pay for this duty (under the AUO system) ...” (Emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.