Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

4 Cow. 142

Davis v. Adams

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1825

New York Supreme Court · decided 1825-02-15

Assumpsit on two promissory notes, made at Alexandria, in the district of Columbia. The defendant had pleaded the same plea .as he had done in the cause of Whittimore v. Adams0 (2 Cowen’s Hep. 626.) At first, the plaintiff demurred an^ the defendant joined in demurrer; but on seeing the report of the first case, the plaintiff at the last term, byS.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1850

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1825-02-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Curia.

¶1The .plaintiff should either have retained his de'tirrerj and gone to argument upon the calendar, or confessed the defendant’s plea, taking a judgment to he levied °f his goods and chattels; or have taken -issue, .suffered a verdict for the defendant, and then moved for judgment non ' obstante veredicto, as was done in Whittimore v. Adams. The defendant ds;entitled to retain his plea upon the record, and have it passed upon by the Court, with a view to his writ of error. Therule -for judgment must he set aside with costs ; but under the special circumstances of this case, the plaintiff may enter up judgment as upon the demurrer and joinder heretofore interposed in the case.

¶2Rule accordingly.

/4/cow/142 · .json · Public domain