Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

4 Cow. 505

Philips v. Caswell

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1825

New York Supreme Court · decided 1825-08-15

On certiorari to a Justice’s Court, it appeared that the attorney for the plaintiff in error wrote the return; hut he swore that the justice voluntarily, and without request, came to his office, and desired him to write it, which he did, the justice dictating the whole of the facts. A motion was now made to set aside the return as irreguiar; and Fox v. Johnson, (3 Cowen’s Rep. 20,) was relied on.

Decided 1825-08-15

Curia.

¶1We think the attorney, in this case, comes within the character of a mere amanuensis for the justice. Such an exception to the rule, established by Fox v. Johnson, was mentioned by the Court; and we think it does not come Avithin the reason of the rule. The motion is denied.

¶2Motion denied.

/4/cow/505 · .json · Public domain