Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 DELCH 416 - Downs v. Rickards

Downs v. Rickards’s Empirical Analysis

1872

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
4
states following
April 1999
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 1999

11 state decisions

401872188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Botsford v. Burr · Seth v. Cramer · Boyd v. M'Lean · Reigal v. Wood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In view of the difficulty of unraveling fraud in these transactions, the policy of the rule is to exclude the possibility of it by making the prohibition absolute.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.