Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

4 Dem. Sur. 366

Reilley v. Duffy

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 15, 1886

New York Surrogate's Court · decided 1886-03-15

This was an application by a father and guardian on behalf of infants for the judicial settlement of the account of Letitia Duffy, the administratrix of their maternal grandfather’s estate; opposed by the administratrix on the ground that the infants were not “persons interested” in the estate, under Code Civ. Pro., § 2514, and therefore not entitled to an accounting under § 2726.

Decided 1886-03-15

The Surrogate.

¶1This is a proceeding wherein the petitioner, as the guardian of the two infant children of Mary C. Reilley, deceased, applies for an order directing the administratrix of this estate to file an account. The respondent concedes that previously to *368January 6th, 1885, Mrs. Reilley, who was one of the daughters of this decedent, was a- person interested in his estate; but by the answer of the administratrix it appears that, on that day, she executed and delivered to her a release of her interest therein.

¶2The execution and delivery of this release are not disputed, but the petitioner has filed an affidavit alleging that it was obtained by the fraud, coercion and undue influence of the respondent.

¶3The question whether the release is for this cause invalid, the Surrogate has no jurisdiction to determine. But in view of the sworn allegation of its invalidity, I must order an accounting (Fraenznick v. Miller, 1 Dem., 136; Harris v. Ely, 25 N. Y., 138; Rieben v. Hicks, 4 Bradf., 136; Schmidt v. Heusner, ante, 275).

/4/demsur/366 · .json · Public domain