Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

4 Denio 159

Worden v. Dodge

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1847

New York Supreme Court · decided 1847-01-15

Assumpsit. On the trial the plaintiff gave in evidence an agreement, signed by the defendants, bearing date October 12, 1839, by which, for value received, they jointly and severally promised to pay to the plaintiff, by his name or order, §250, with interest, payable one half in two years and the other half in three years from the day of said agreement, “ out of the net proceeds, after paying the costs and expenses of ore to be raised and sold from the bed on the lot this…

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1894

1 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1847-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the Court, Beardsley, J.

¶1The nonsuit was proper. A promissory note must be payable absolutely, and not upon any contingency as to time or event. (3 Kent, 5th ed. p. 74; Smith on Merc. Law. 113, 116; Story on Prom. Notes, §§ 1, 22 to 26; *160id. on Bills of Exch. §§ 46, 47; Chit. on Bills, 10th Amer. ed., p. 132 to 139.)

¶2This was not such an engagement, for although the promise was to make payments at certain specified times, the payments were to be made “ out of the net proceeds ” “ of ore to be raised and sold ” from a certain ore bed. Here was a contingency; the fund might turn out to be inadequate, in which case there would be no obligation to pay at any time. It was not a promise to pay “ absolutely and at all events,” as a promissory note always is.

¶3New trial denied.

/4/denio/159 · .json · Public domain