Rupinski v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
4 F.2d 17 · 1925
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably Downey v. United States (1937), United States v. Daddino (1993)
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boyd v. United States · Gouled v. United States · United States v. Mayer · Phillips v. Negley · Ex Parte Charles Sibbald v. The United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“well-recognized exception in the case of mere clerical errors.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the journal of the court, through an error on the part of the clerk, recite[d] the dismissal of count 2.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“error . . . discovered[] long after the term had passed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.