Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 F.2d 225 - Breneman v. Corrigan

Breneman v. Corrigan’s Empirical Analysis

4 F.2d 225 · 1925

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2010

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

301925193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on White v. Stump · Howell v. Folsom · Hayes v. Horton · Jackson, Orr & Co. v. Shelton · In re Culwell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A homestead shall be exempt from sale on execution from the lien of every judgment and from liability in any form for the debts of the owner to the amount in value of three thousand dollars ($3,000), except as otherwise provided by law. The homestead must be the actual abode of and occupied by the owner, his or her spouse, parent or child, and such exemption shall not be impaired by temporary removal or absence with the intention to reoccupy the same as a homestead, nor by the sale thereof, but shall extend to the proceeds derived from such sale to an amount not exceeding three thousand dollars ($3,000), while held, with the intention to procure another homestead therewith, for a period not exceeding one year.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.