Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 F.2d 635 - Millette v. United State

Millette v. United State’s Empirical Analysis

4 F.2d 635 · 1925

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
March 1936
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Solomon Kenofskey · Demolli v. United States · Burton v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If, however, there was evidence from which the jury might fairly conclude that he intended and planned that the cars should be so transported, and that wholly or partly through his planning and contriving his purpose was effected, and the ears were so transported interstate, the charge that he caused it to be done would he sustained.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““If * * * he planned to dispose of these stolen cars in such manner that they should be transported from Minnesota to Wisconsin, and that this purpose was effected, we believe the conclusion is justified that he caused the cars to be transported in interstate commerce.” Millette v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 4 F.(2d) 635 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.