Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

4 F.3d 1004

Docket No. 90-3119.

United States v. Bailey

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-10-08

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1994

3 federal appellate ·

Relies on United States v. Bailey

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1993-10-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge; WALD, EDWARDS, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

¶2ORDER

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Appellant’s Suggestion For Rehearing En Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

¶5*1005ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is granted and this case will be reheard by the Court sitting en banc.

¶6It is FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the judgment of the court filed herein on June 18, 1993, 995 F.2d 1113, is hereby vacated,

/4/f3d/1004 · .json · Public domain