Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 F.3d 1285 - Washington v. Murray

Washington v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis

4 F.3d 1285 · 1993

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 2015

11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

70199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Kenley v. Armontrout · Sims v. Livesay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendant shows that he was prejudiced by his attorney’s ineffectiveness by demonstrating that ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’ [Strickland, 466 U.S.] at 694. See also, id., at 695 (Where a defendant challenges his conviction, he must show that there exists ‘a reasonable probability that, absent the errors, the factfinder would have had a reasonable doubt respecting guilt’). And, in determining the existence vel non of prejudice, the court ‘must consider the totality of the evidence before the judge or jury.’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Washington had supplied without prompting details of the crime that were corroborated by evidence taken from the scene and by the observations of those investigating the Williams' apartment”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.