Resolution Trust Corp. v. Midwest Federal Savings Bank’s Empirical Analysis
4 F.3d 1490 · 1993
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably National Union Fire Insurance v. City Savings, F.S.B. (1994), Federal Deposit Insurance v. Bathgate (1994)
15 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1441A · 12 U.S.C. § 1821 · 12 U.S.C. § 1823 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Vandygriff v. Phillips · D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · United States v. McConney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“presentment and proof to the RTC of all potential affirmative defenses that might be asserted in response to unknown and unasserted claims or actions by the RTC”) (citations omitted); Heno v. FDIC, 996 F.2d 429, 433-34 (1st Cir.1993) (refusing to apply § 1821(d)(13)(D) exhaustion requirement to § 1821(e) contract repudiation claim where”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(i) any claim or action for payment from ... the assets of any depository institution for which the Corporation has been appointed receiver ... or (ii) any claim relating to any act or omission of such institution or the Corporation as receiver.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a district court has subject matter jurisdiction over affirmative defenses raised by a defendant who, prior to being sued by the RTC, was not a creditor of the RTC and who had no independent basis for filing a claim against the RTC....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Resolution Trust Corporation as Conservator for Occidental Nebraska Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. Titan Financial Corporation, a California Corporation Frances Pikush Gilbert Sellan, Resolution Trust Corporation as Conservator for Occidental Nebraska Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. Titan Financial Corporation, a California Corporation Gilbert Sellan · Resolution Trust Corporation Fsb v. Titan Financial Corporation Resolution Trust Corporation Fsb
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.