Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 F.3d 574 - Anderson v. Douglas County

Anderson v. Douglas County’s Empirical Analysis

4 F.3d 574 · 1993

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 12 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2021 · most notably Mayhew v. Town of Sunnyvale (1998), Temporomandibular Joint Implants Products Liability Litigation Temporomandibular Joint Implant Recipients v. The Dow Chemical Company

21 federal appellate · 12 district · 7 state decisions

3201993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Littlefield v. City of Afton · Sooner Products Co. v. McBride · Chesterfield Development Corporation v. City of Chesterfield M R · Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of Richfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “truly irrational, that is, something more than ... arbitrary, capricious, or in violation of state law.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “applying only to persons whose names begin with a letter in the first half of the alphabet.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.