United States v. Markum’s Empirical Analysis
4 F.3d 891 · 1993
Citation profile
64 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 111 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably United States v. Massey (1995), United States v. Lang (1996)
64 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1621 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · United States v. Dunnigan · Conway v. Statesman Mortgage Co. · United States v. Grayson · Carolco Television Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Evidence is sufficient to support a conviction if the evidence and the reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, when viewed in the light most favorable to the government, would allow a reasonable jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A witness testifying under oath or affirmation violates this statute if [ ]he gives false testimony concerning a material matter with the willful intent to provide false testimony, rather than as a result of confusion, mistake, or faulty memory.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f the defendant willfully obstructed or impeded, or attempted to obstruct or impede, the administration of justice during the investigation, prosecution, or sentencing of the instant offense.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.