Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 F.3d 925 - United States v. Queen

United States v. Queen’s Empirical Analysis

4 F.3d 925 · 1993

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
October 2018
most recently cited

58 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2018 · most notably United States v. Williamson (1995), United States v. Ghertler (2010)

58 federal appellate · 3 district ·

510199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1163 · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 153

Relies on Wellman v. Wellman · Herman v. Department of Treasury · United States v. Hill · United States v. Georgiadis · United States v. Lieberman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] position of trust ... must be established from the perspective of the victim.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he extent to which the position provides the freedom to commit a diffieult-to-detect wrong, and whether an abuse could be simply or readily noticed; defendant’s duties as compared to those of other employees; defendant’s level of specialized knowledge; defendant’s level of authority in the position; and the level of public trust.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to penalize defendants who take advantage of a position that provides them freedom to commit or conceal a difficult-to-detect wrong.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.