Mojtabai v. Mojtabai’s Empirical Analysis
2021
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission · Marshall v. Marshall · United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers of America v. Pleasant Street Corporation United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers of America · IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. Herrmann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“relief sought would not require the court to probate or annul a will, administer a decedent's estate, or 'dispose of property that is in the custody of a state probate court'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Glassie v. Doucette
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.