Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 FRD 475 - Griffith v. William Penn Broadcasting Co.

Griffith v. William Penn Broadcasting Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
6
states following
March 1986
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 5 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 1986 · most notably Arnstein v. Porter (1946), Page v. Sloan (1972)

6 federal appellate · 5 district · 11 state decisions

12019451950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whitaker v. Coleman · Engl v. Ætna Life Ins. · Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. · Walling v. Fairmont Creamery Co. · Miller v. Miller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Defendant’s failure to file a counter-affidavit to support its opposition to the motions is of no significance. United States v. Newbury Mfg. Co., D.C.Mass., 1 F.R.D. 718 . The burden rests upon plaintiff, the moving party, to establish the nonexistence of a genuine issue of fact. Walling v. Fairmount Creamery Co., 8 Cir., 139 F.2d 318 . In the absence of a showing in the pleadings and deposition that, in the event the case should go to trial, there would be no competent evidence to support findings of fact in defendant’s favor, plaintiff has not met his burden. Beidler & Bookmyer, Inc., v. Universal Ins. Co., 2 Cir., 134 F.2d 828 .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.