4 Ga. App. 272
Decided April 22, 1908
Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1908-04-22
<p>1. The verdict was not without evidence to support it.</p> <p>2. Grounds of a motion for a new trial dependent upon facts dehors the record will not be considered, unless approved or certified to be true by the presiding judge.</p>
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1912
3 state decisions
Relies on Altman v. State · Williams v. State · Sindy v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1908-04-22
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The original motion contains only the general grounds; the amendment contains several special grounds. The grounds of the amendment are not verified or approved by the trial judge. The following endorsement, signed by the judge, is not equivalent to an approval: “Bead, considered, and allowed.” Williams v. State, 120 Ga. 488 (48 S. E. 149); Sindy v. State, 120 Ga. 202 (47 S. E. 554); Jackson v. State, 116 Ga. 834 (43 S. E. 255).
¶2Judgment affirmed.