Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 GAAPP 588 - Rose v. State

Rose v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
6
states following
November 1989
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 1989

19 state decisions

110190819101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Allgeyer v. State of Louisiana · Burton v. United States · Leisy v. Hardin · Hooper v. People of State of California · Rhodes v. State of Iowa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “communicated by telephone, the solicitation would only be complete when the message was heard by the probable purchaser; and therefore the crime would be complete at the location occupied by the person solicited during the conversation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.