Waller v. Waller

ON APPEAL. An intention of G. W. to give his brother, E. G. W.-, an interest ’in his business, does not make him a partner. The fact that E. G. W. held G. W.’s power of attorney and signed his brother’s name as his attorney in fact” considered as evidence to show no partnership. The use of the words “¡us” and “we” by G. W., in his business correspondence with E. G. W., is not sufficient proof of partnership between.them. ■> Opinion of the Chancellor appealed from.