Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 Haw. App. 646 - State v. Buffalo

4 Haw. App. 646 - State v. Buffalo’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2010

20 state decisions

1001983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burgett v. Texas · Scalza v. United States · 66 Cal. 2d 881 - In Re Black · State v. O'DANIEL · State v. Freitas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A long established rule of evidence is that a judgment or decree itself is the highest and best evidence of its content. Consequently, the best evidence to prove a conviction is the judgment of conviction itself or a properly authenticated copy thereof.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) a cover sheet which purports to be an attestation and certification of the attached documents by the clerk of the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Orange; (2) a copy of the second amended information charging [the defendant] with the wilful, unlawful and felonious killing of a human being in violation of § 187 of the California Penal Code; (3) a copy of the clerk's minutes of the arraignment hearing; (4) a copy of the clerk's minutes of the sentencing hearing; and (5) an Abstract of Judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a]ll they indicate is that person named Joseph William Buffalo was charged on an information and that the court clerk's minutes indicate that he was found guilty of second degree murder. Proof of an information is not proof of conviction and the clerk's minutes are not the best evidence of conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.