4 H. & McH. 91
Decided November 15, 1797
Court of Appeals of Maryland · decided 1797-11-15
As the case appears to be sufficiently stated in the arguments of the counsel concerned on the appeal, in the court of appeals, the Reporters have omitted to give any other statement» Hanson, chancellor, (May term 1794) gave his opinion, that the court of chancery might compel the defendants to perform the contract stated in the bilí, considering the price to be paid for the land to be Intended to be paid or discounted in specie; that as nothing appeared in the cause to…
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1868
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1797-11-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The Court or Appease,
¶2at this term* (November 1797,) decreed, that so much of the decree of the court of chancery as directed the payment of 901. 15s. Sd. with interest, by the appellee to the appellants, should be reversedj and the decree of the court of chancery, in ail other matters and things, except the said payment in manner-aforesaid, was by the court of appeals affirmed*