¶1This was an *183action of replevin, in the detinet, in which the defendant avowed the detention of the property as a mechanic having a lien thereon for the manufacturing. And the question arose on demurrer, as to the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s plea in bar, setting up a special agreement between them in answer to said avowry. (Reported 3 Denio, 590.)
4 How. Pr. 182
Curtis v. Jones
Decided November 15, 1847
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1847-11-15
—Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part, and neither party, as against the other, to have costs in this court.
Decided 1847-11-15