Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

4 How. Pr. 290

Enos v. Thomas

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1849

New York Supreme Court · decided 1849-09-15

<p>A motion may be made to refer a cause under § StO of the Code, immediately on receiving a reply to the answer, and the party is not bound to wait twenty days to see if the defendant will amend Ms answer.</p>

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1889

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1849-09-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Willard, Justice.

¶1An ispue of fact was joined on the 8th August, by the service of the reply to the defendants’ answer. It was therefore regular to move to refer the cause. (§ 270 of the Code.) It is no objection that the defendant’s time within which he might amend his answer by § 172 had not expired when the notice was served. It does not appear that he has since amended. The party is not bound to wait, before making the motion, to see whether the pleadings will be amended. He has a right to act upon them as they are served. A subsequent amendment cannot defeat a motion for a reference, unless by such amendment there ceases to be an issue either of fact or law between the parties.

¶2The motion to refer must be granted to Wm. A. Beach, who is agreed upon as the referee in case the court grant the motion.

/4/howpr/290 · .json · Public domain