4 Idaho 794
Decided June 1, 1896
Idaho Supreme Court · decided 1896-06-01
The second point on which the court granted, the nonsuit was that the location notice and record of the Magpie claim failed to sufficiently describe the locus of the claim with reference to natural objects of permanent monuments as required by section 2324 of the United States Revised Statutes and section '3102 of the Revised Statutes of Idaho. On this point the evidence shows that John Brown, the locator, was unable to read or write.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1987
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1896-06-01
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1ON PETITION POR REHEARING.
¶2We have carefully examined and re-examined the petition for rehearing in this ease, and the authorities therein cited, and we are unable to find anything therein which would warrant us in granting the prayer of the petition.
¶3The petition is a very specious argument against the conclusion of the court, but it differs very little from the argument on the hearing.
¶4The petition for rehearing is denied.