Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 Ill. 2d 16 - Walker v. Witt

4 Ill. 2d 16 - Walker v. Witt’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2000

20 state decisions

100195419601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Finn v. Williams · Trapp v. Gordon · Carter v. Michel · Traylor v. Parkinson · Vanpatten v. Loof

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]his distinction does not prevail in the Illinois cases, and * * * the degree of necessity required is not so strict, it being necessary only that `the use of the claimed easement be essential to the beneficial enjoyment of the land granted or retained.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.