Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 IND 388 - Hubbs v. Bancroft

Hubbs v. Bancroft’s Empirical Analysis

1853

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 1955
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 1955

7 state decisions

3018531860187018801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . the ground upon which we decide is that the evidence, in our opinion, does not show the conveyance to have been made or received with intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors. Therefore, the decree must be reversed, and the circuit court ordered to dismiss the bill.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.