Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

4 Ind. 617

Eastes v. Daubenspeck

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1853

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1853-12-31

<p>A bill of exceptions, wbicb does not appear to have been signed by a judge, cannot be noticed.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1877

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1853-12-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The bill of exceptions in this case, or what purports to be such, does not appear to be signed by any judge. The errors complained of arise upon no other part of the record.

¶2We cannot take any notice of the contents of the alleged bill of exceptions in the absence of the authentication of a judge’s signature.

¶3The judgment is affirmed, with 10 per cent, damages and costs.

/4/ind/617 · .json · Public domain