Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

4 Johns. 491

Thomas v. Croswell

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1809

New York Supreme Court · decided 1809-08-15

<p>A special jury will not bs granted, in an action for a libel against a person, who is a public officer», unless the libel relates to his o/jicial conducts See a?ite9 'Thomas ve Itumseu,</p>

Decided 1809-08-15

Per Curiam.

¶1In the cases of Spencer v. Sampson, and Foot v. Croswell, (1 Caines, 489.) Livingston v. Cheetham, (1 Johns. Rep. 61.) and Van Vechten v. Hopkins, (2 Johns. Rep. 373.) the rule was settled, that unless it appears, that the plaintiff was libelled for his official conduct, in some important public trust, we will not grant a special jury; In the present case, though the plaintiff was at the time, a representative in congress, and major-general of the militia of the state, yet it does not appear that he was libelled for any conduct in either of those official characters.

¶2The motion must, therefore, be denied.

¶3Rule refused.

/4/johns/491 · .json · Public domain