4 Johns. Ch. 116
Decided August 25, 1819
New York Court of Chancery · decided 1819-08-25
THE bill stated, that the plaintiiT is one of the children and heirs of Peter Bregaui, deceased, and that the defendant and Bareni Vanderpoel were appointed administrators of P. B., and that the defendant was, afterwards, appointed administrator of John Bregaw, one of the sons of P. B. and who died without issue, and intestate. The bill charged the defendant with various acts of fraud and breach of trust, as administrator of P. B., and as administrator of John Bregaw.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1894
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1819-08-25
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1said, that in this case, the allegations in the plea were to be assumed as true, and, therefore, the plea must prevail. No reason appeared why the co-administrator was not made a party. Leave was given to the plaintiff to amend his bill, upon payment of costs. (Mitford’s Tr. 221. 1 P. Wms. 428.)
¶2Order accordingly.