4 Kan. App. 2d 178 - Williams v. Darr’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
5
states following
November 1997
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · 39 Ill. 2d 436 - The People v. Love · State v. Lassley · 184 Cal. App. 2d 507 - Rost v. Municipal Court · 3 Kan. App. 2d 726 - In Re Berkowitz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Prior to his arrest, petitioner was not informed of the outstanding warrant and had no reasonable means of discovering its existence. No detainer was filed by the State. Under the facts of this case, the State may not be heard to say it was unaware of petitioner’s incarceration and whereabouts so as to excuse its failure to file a detainer at KSIR or to serve the arrest warrant in Sedgwick County.... ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Holmes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.