4 Kan. App. 2d 210 - State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1997
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Gustin · State v. Goodseal · State v. Sanders · State v. Edwards · State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A review of the facts in each case is necessary to determine whether violence is reasonably foreseeable as a probable consequence of committing the crime intended. State v. Edwards, 209 Kan. 681, 686 , 498 P.2d 48 (1972). Defendant has a heavy burden, for the necessary intent and foreseeability may be inferred from circumstantial evidence [citation omitted] and is a fact question for jury determination. State v. Edwards, 209 Kan. at 686 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Warren
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.