4 Kan. App. 2d 403 - State v. Greenberg’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2006
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · North Carolina v. Pearce · Delaware v. Prouse · Leary v. United States · Marchetti v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘A defendant’s statements to a police officer are not automatically inadmissible for failure to give him the Miranda warning unless the statements are the product of custodial interrogation.’ State v. Edwards, 224 Kan. 266 , Syl. ¶ 1, 579 P.2d 1209 (1978); State v. Bohanan, 220 Kan. 121 , Syl. ¶ 1, 551 P.2d 828 (1976). In Bohanan the Court contrasted a ‘custodial interrogation’ where the warning is required with an .‘investigatory interrogation’ where it is not. The latter variety was defined as ‘the questioning of persons by law enforcement officers in a routine manner in an investigation which has not reached an accusatory stage and where such persons are not in legal custody or deprived of their freedom of action in any significant way.’ State v. Bohanan, 220 Kan. at 128 . Custodial interrogation on the other hand, requires ‘significant restraints on [a subject’s] freedom of movement which are imposed by some law enforcement agency.’ State v. Brunner, 211 Kan. 596 , Syl. ¶ 2, 507 P.2d 233 (1973).” State v. Greenberg, 4 Kan. App. 2d 403, 404-405 , 607 P.2d 530 , rev. denied 228 Kan. 807 (1980).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Goering
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.