Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 Md. App. 114 - Rasnick v. State

4 Md. App. 114 - Rasnick v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2003
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Estep v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘No matter how sordid the case and how suspicious the circumstances, we cannot permit a person charged with crime to be convicted without evidence. The conjectures of the trial judge might be entirely correct, and the evidence produced before him might be false in important particulars. Nevertheless, a conviction without proof cannot be sustained under the laws of this State. A man is innocent until he is proved guilty, and there must be evidence which leads to such a re- suit. Since we find there was no such evidence in this case, the judgment must be reversed.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.