Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 Md. App. 222 - Gibson v. State

4 Md. App. 222 - Gibson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
November 1984
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently November 1984 · most notably 6 Md. App. 59 - Smith v. State (1969), 5 Md. App. 340 - Nichols v. State (1968)

30 state decisions

160196819701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Abel v. United States · 3 Md. App. 11 - Boone v. State · 1 Md. App. 362 - Hutchinson v. State · 1 Md. App. 98 - Crumb v. State · 1 Md. App. 213 - Logan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In a nonjury trial, the judge determines the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses, Sutton v. State, 2 Md. App. 639 , 236 A. 2d 301 ; Sadler v. State, 1 Md. App. 383 , 230 A. 2d 372 . Indentification by the victim is enough to convict. Davis v. State, 2 Md. App. 630 , 236 A. 2d 307 , but if there is a lack of positiveness in the identification, this only goes to the weight not the admissibility of the evidence, Logan v. State, 1 Md. App. 213, 216 , 228 A. 2d 837 , and ‘the weight that should be given the testimony was for the trial court’ to decide, Dortch v. State, 1 Md. App. 173, 177 , 229 A. 2d 148 . The evidence as to the identification was sufficient to support the verdict. . . .” Gibson v. State, 4 Md. App. 222 , 242 A. 2d 204 at 206 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.