Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 Md. App. 269 - Corbett v. State

4 Md. App. 269 - Corbett v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 2020

5 state decisions

201968197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on de Bearn v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. · Fletcher v. Flournoy · Morse v. Lewis · Fletcher v. Bryan · Christopher v. Sisk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We hold that the trial judge was clearly erroneous when he relied upon knowledge acquired from outside of the record that Corbett and Morgan had been jointly indicted for other offenses. The other indictments were not introduced into evidence and were not called to the attention of the judge on the record, and it was not until the decision was announced that the trial judge indicated that he had any knowledge of these other indictments.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.