4 Md. App. 572 - Bryant v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently October 1992 · most notably State v. Cox (1983), 93 Md. App. 422 - Lamb v. State (1992)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 2 Md. App. 692 - Tender v. State · Williams v. Graff · 1 Md. App. 362 - Hutchinson v. State · Jones v. State · 3 Md. App. 270 - Fabian v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . the intent with which a harmful act is done is usually not expressed in words, and the trier of facts is permitted to draw such inferences of intent as are warranted under all the circumstances of a particular case.” Bryant v. State, 4 Md. App. 572, 578 , 244 A. 2d 446 (1968).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The general rule is that a witness may be cross-examined on such matters and facts as are likely to affect his credibility, test his memory or knowledge, show his relationship to the parties or cause, his bias or the like.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.