Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 MINN 325 - State v. Timmens

State v. Timmens’s Empirical Analysis

1860

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
11
states following
July 1953
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 1953 · most notably Wilson v. State (1883), Allen v. State (1909)

28 state decisions — followed in 11 states

901860187018801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A conviction can not be had under this statute upon the testimony of the woman seduced unless she is corroborated upon every material point necessary to the perfection of the offence, to wit: the promise to marry, the seduction under such promise, and the previous chaste character of the party seduced.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.