Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 MUNF 251 - Quarles v. Lacy

Quarles v. Lacy’s Empirical Analysis

1814

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2018 · most notably Sexton v. Wheaton (1823), Gordon, Rankin & Co. v. Tweedy (1881)

27 state decisions

70181418201830184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “consider themselves impartial agents for both parties, and act in all sales for the interest of the debtor as well as the creditor”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.