¶1The act of 1715 is clearly a bar to the plaintiff's recovery; and it is not, therefore, necessary to consider the question as to the ordinary statute of limitations.
¶2Cited: McKeithan v. McGill, 83 N.C. 517.
4 N.C. 28
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 5, 1814
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1814-01-05
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1825
1 state decisions
Relies on McKeithan v. . McGill
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1814-01-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The act of 1715 is clearly a bar to the plaintiff's recovery; and it is not, therefore, necessary to consider the question as to the ordinary statute of limitations.
¶2Cited: McKeithan v. McGill, 83 N.C. 517.