¶1 This is a motion to amend the verdict after judgment, and where there is nothing to amend by. We recollect no precedent of such a case. To permit it here would be to make a new verdict for the jury.
¶2 Motion overruled.
¶3 NOTE. — See Dunn v. Batchelor , 20 N.C. 52
¶4 (442)
Download
Copy
Embed on your site
iframe Markdown Preview card Button Hover to preview · click to copy the code
Case posture Posture DEBT on bond in the county court of HERTFORD, where at May Sessions, 1815, a verdict was found for the plaintiff, but by mistake in calculating interest or entering up the verdict there was a deficiency of $61.46. At August Sessions, 1815, the mistake was discovered and a rule obtained on the defendant to show cause why the verdict should not be amended and an execution issue for the deficient sum. This rule was made absolute at February Sessions, 1816, and the defendant appealed to the Superior Court, when the case was transmitted to this Court. Source: CourtListener
